News & Blog

How to Conduct a Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessment

By Master Trainer Cassie Herman

There are several different types of preference assessment.  In previous behavioral briefs, we reviewed a Free Operant Observation Preference Assessment and a Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessment.  This Behavioral Brief will focus on Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessment (MS).

There are two different types of Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessments:
  • Multiple-Stimulus with Replacement
  • Multiple-Stimulus without Replacement (MSWO)

Both assessments will be discussed within this Behavioral Brief.

A Multiple-Stimulus without Replacement Preference Assessment is similar to a Paired-Stimulus. This is because they both identify high-preference, moderate-preference, and low-preferred items.  The data is displayed in a hierarchy.  This assessment can be completed in less time than both Pair-Stimulus and Free Operant Preference assessment.

The limitation of the Multiple-Stimulus assessment is that the individuals must have strong scanning repertoire due to an array of 5 to 7 items being presented (DeLeon & Iwata, 1996). If the individual does not have a strong scanning repertoire then the Free Operant, Single-Stimulus or a Paired-Stimulus should be conducted.

Teaser:

Identifying a high-preferred reinforcer is a crucial component in the creation of a behavior change program.  Stay tuned for our 3rd installment on Stimulus Preference Assessments.  In this behavioral brief we will be discussing Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessments!

Visit our YouTube page to find more Behavioral Briefs: Making Reinforcement Effective and Debriefing with the Individual Following Behavioral Escalation.

You might also enjoy some of our behavioral blog posts: Performance Issues: “Can’t do” versus “Won’t do” and Escape Maintained Challenging Behavior.

Schedule a FREE consultation

Safety-Care provides evidence-based incident prevention and management training. Safety-Care promotes a reinforcement-based approach to developing new skills, maintaining safety, and reducing or eliminating restrictive interventions such as restraint. Our training improves safety for staff and the individuals they support while reducing the frequency and severity of dangerous incidents.